The goal of this feature is to allow the Spark driver to run in an
isolated environment, such as a docker container, and be able to use
the host's port forwarding mechanism to be able to accept connections
from the outside world.

The change is restricted to the driver: there is no support for achieving
the same thing on executors (or the YARN AM for that matter). Those still
need full access to the outside world so that, for example, connections
can be made to an executor's block manager.

The core of the change is simple: add a new configuration that tells what's
the address the driver should bind to, which can be different than the address
it advertises to executors (spark.driver.host). Everything else is plumbing
the new configuration where it's needed.

To use the feature, the host starting the container needs to set up the
driver's port range to fall into a range that is being forwarded; this
required the block manager port to need a special configuration just for
the driver, which falls back to the existing spark.blockManager.port when
not set. This way, users can modify the driver settings without affecting
the executors; it would theoretically be nice to also have different
retry counts for driver and executors, but given that docker (at least)
allows forwarding port ranges, we can probably live without that for now.

Because of the nature of the feature it's kinda hard to add unit tests;
I just added a simple one to make sure the configuration works.

This was tested with a docker image running spark-shell with the following
command:

 docker blah blah blah \
   -p 38000-38100:38000-38100 \
   [image] \
   spark-shell \
     --num-executors 3 \
     --conf spark.shuffle.service.enabled=false \
     --conf spark.dynamicAllocation.enabled=false \
     --conf spark.driver.host=[host's address] \
     --conf spark.driver.port=38000 \
     --conf spark.driver.blockManager.port=38020 \
     --conf spark.ui.port=38040

Running on YARN; verified the driver works, executors start up and listen
on ephemeral ports (instead of using the driver's config), and that caching
and shuffling (without the shuffle service) works. Clicked through the UI
to make sure all pages (including executor thread dumps) worked. Also tested
apps without docker, and ran unit tests.

Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>

Closes #15120 from vanzin/SPARK-4563.

[SPARK-17359][SQL][MLLIB] Use ArrayBuffer.+=(A) instead of ArrayBuffer.append(A) in performance critical paths

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

We should generally use `ArrayBuffer.+=(A)` rather than `ArrayBuffer.append(A)`, because `append(A)` would involve extra boxing / unboxing.

## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Author: Liwei Lin <lwlin7@gmail.com>

Closes #14914 from lw-lin/append_to_plus_eq_v2.

No idea why it was failing (the needed import was there), but
this makes things work.

Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>

Closes #14925 from vanzin/SPARK-16533.

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request reverts the changes made as a part of #14605, which simply side-steps the deadlock issue. Instead, I propose the following approach:
* Use `scheduleWithFixedDelay` when calling `ExecutorAllocationManager.schedule` for scheduling executor requests. The intent of this is that if invocations are delayed beyond the default schedule interval on account of lock contention, then we avoid a situation where calls to `schedule` are made back-to-back, potentially releasing and then immediately reacquiring these locks - further exacerbating contention.
* Replace a number of calls to `askWithRetry` with `ask` inside of message handling code in `CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend` and its ilk. This allows us queue messages with the relevant endpoints, release whatever locks we might be holding, and then block whilst awaiting the response. This change is made at the cost of being able to retry should sending the message fail, as retrying outside of the lock could easily cause race conditions if other conflicting messages have been sent whilst awaiting a response. I believe this to be the lesser of two evils, as in many cases these RPC calls are to process local components, and so failures are more likely to be deterministic, and timeouts are more likely to be caused by lock contention.

## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests, and manual tests under yarn-client mode.

Author: Angus Gerry <angolon@gmail.com>

Closes #14710 from angolon/SPARK-16533.

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The master is broken because #14882 didn't run mesos tests.

## How was this patch tested?

Jenkins unit tests.

Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>

Closes #14902 from zsxwing/hotfix.

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Move Mesos code into a mvn module

## How was this patch tested?

unit tests
manually submitting a client mode and cluster mode job
spark/mesos integration test suite

Author: Michael Gummelt <mgummelt@mesosphere.io>

Closes #14637 from mgummelt/mesos-module.