Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 6abc45e3 authored by Xiangrui Meng's avatar Xiangrui Meng
Browse files

[SPARK-5254][MLLIB] remove developers section from spark.ml guide

Forgot to remove this section in #4052.

Author: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>

Closes #4053 from mengxr/SPARK-5254-update and squashes the following commits:

f295bde [Xiangrui Meng] remove developers section from spark.ml guide
parent cfa397c1
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
...@@ -689,17 +689,3 @@ Spark ML currently depends on MLlib and has the same dependencies. ...@@ -689,17 +689,3 @@ Spark ML currently depends on MLlib and has the same dependencies.
Please see the [MLlib Dependencies guide](mllib-guide.html#Dependencies) for more info. Please see the [MLlib Dependencies guide](mllib-guide.html#Dependencies) for more info.
Spark ML also depends upon Spark SQL, but the relevant parts of Spark SQL do not bring additional dependencies. Spark ML also depends upon Spark SQL, but the relevant parts of Spark SQL do not bring additional dependencies.
# Developers
**Development plan**
If all goes well, `spark.ml` will become the primary ML package at the time of the Spark 1.3 release. Initially, simple wrappers will be used to port algorithms to `spark.ml`, but eventually, code will be moved to `spark.ml` and `spark.mllib` will be deprecated.
**Advice to developers**
During the next development cycle, new algorithms should be contributed to `spark.mllib`, but we welcome patches sent to either package. If an algorithm is best expressed using the new API (e.g., feature transformers), we may ask for developers to use the new `spark.ml` API.
Wrappers for old and new algorithms can be contributed to `spark.ml`.
Users will be able to use algorithms from either of the two packages. The main difficulty will be the differences in APIs between the two packages.
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment