[SPARK-7655][Core] Deserializing value should not hold the TaskSchedulerImpl lock

We should not call `DirectTaskResult.value` when holding the `TaskSchedulerImpl` lock. It may cost dozens of seconds to deserialize a large object.

Author: zsxwing <zsxwing@gmail.com>

Closes #6195 from zsxwing/SPARK-7655 and squashes the following commits:

21f502e [zsxwing] Add more comments
e25fa88 [zsxwing] Add comments
15010b5 [zsxwing] Deserialize value should not hold the TaskSchedulerImpl lock

core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResult.scala

@@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ class DirectTaskResult[T](var valueBytes: ByteBuffer, var accumUpdates: Map[Long
     var metrics: TaskMetrics)
   extends TaskResult[T] with Externalizable {
 
+  private var valueObjectDeserialized = false
+  private var valueObject: T = _
+
   def this() = this(null.asInstanceOf[ByteBuffer], null, null)
 
   override def writeExternal(out: ObjectOutput): Unit = Utils.tryOrIOException {
@@ -72,10 +75,26 @@ class DirectTaskResult[T](var valueBytes: ByteBuffer, var accumUpdates: Map[Long
       }
     }
     metrics = in.readObject().asInstanceOf[TaskMetrics]
+    valueObjectDeserialized = false
   }
 
+  /**
+   * When `value()` is called at the first time, it needs to deserialize `valueObject` from
+   * `valueBytes`. It may cost dozens of seconds for a large instance. So when calling `value` at
+   * the first time, the caller should avoid to block other threads.
+   *
+   * After the first time, `value()` is trivial and just returns the deserialized `valueObject`.
+   */
   def value(): T = {
-    val resultSer = SparkEnv.get.serializer.newInstance()
-    resultSer.deserialize(valueBytes)
+    if (valueObjectDeserialized) {
+      valueObject
+    } else {
+      // This should not run when holding a lock because it may cost dozens of seconds for a large
+      // value.
+      val resultSer = SparkEnv.get.serializer.newInstance()
+      valueObject = resultSer.deserialize(valueBytes)
+      valueObjectDeserialized = true
+      valueObject
+    }
   }
 }

core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResultGetter.scala

@@ -54,6 +54,10 @@ private[spark] class TaskResultGetter(sparkEnv: SparkEnv, scheduler: TaskSchedul
               if (!taskSetManager.canFetchMoreResults(serializedData.limit())) {
                 return
               }
+              // deserialize "value" without holding any lock so that it won't block other threads.
+              // We should call it here, so that when it's called again in
+              // "TaskSetManager.handleSuccessfulTask", it does not need to deserialize the value.
+              directResult.value()
               (directResult, serializedData.limit())
             case IndirectTaskResult(blockId, size) =>
               if (!taskSetManager.canFetchMoreResults(size)) {

core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala

@@ -620,6 +620,12 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
     val index = info.index
     info.markSuccessful()
     removeRunningTask(tid)
+    // This method is called by "TaskSchedulerImpl.handleSuccessfulTask" which holds the
+    // "TaskSchedulerImpl" lock until exiting. To avoid the SPARK-7655 issue, we should not
+    // "deserialize" the value when holding a lock to avoid blocking other threads. So we call
+    // "result.value()" in "TaskResultGetter.enqueueSuccessfulTask" before reaching here.
+    // Note: "result.value()" only deserializes the value when it's called at the first time, so
+    // here "result.value()" just returns the value and won't block other threads.
     sched.dagScheduler.taskEnded(
       tasks(index), Success, result.value(), result.accumUpdates, info, result.metrics)
     if (!successful(index)) {