Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 002c1238 authored by Josh Rosen's avatar Josh Rosen
Browse files

[SPARK-7311] Introduce internal Serializer API for determining if serializers...

[SPARK-7311] Introduce internal Serializer API for determining if serializers support object relocation

This patch extends the `Serializer` interface with a new `Private` API which allows serializers to indicate whether they support relocation of serialized objects in serializer stream output.

This relocatibilty property is described in more detail in `Serializer.scala`, but in a nutshell a serializer supports relocation if reordering the bytes of serialized objects in serialization stream output is equivalent to having re-ordered those elements prior to serializing them.  The optimized shuffle path introduced in #4450 and #5868 both rely on serializers having this property; this patch just centralizes the logic for determining whether a serializer has this property.  I also added tests and comments clarifying when this works for KryoSerializer.

This change allows the optimizations in #4450 to be applied for shuffles that use `SqlSerializer2`.

Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>

Closes #5924 from JoshRosen/SPARK-7311 and squashes the following commits:

50a68ca [Josh Rosen] Address minor nits
0a7ebd7 [Josh Rosen] Clarify reason why SqlSerializer2 supports this serializer
123b992 [Josh Rosen] Cleanup for submitting as standalone patch.
4aa61b2 [Josh Rosen] Add missing newline
2c1233a [Josh Rosen] Small refactoring of SerializerPropertiesSuite to enable test re-use:
0ba75e6 [Josh Rosen] Add tests for serializer relocation property.
450fa21 [Josh Rosen] Back out accidental log4j.properties change
86d4dcd [Josh Rosen] Flag that SparkSqlSerializer2 supports relocation
b9624ee [Josh Rosen] Expand serializer API and use new function to help control when new UnsafeShuffle path is used.
parent f2c47082
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment