-
Yin Huai authored
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? I recently hit a bug of com.thoughtworks.paranamer/paranamer, which causes jackson fail to handle byte array defined in a case class. Then I find https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-module-scala/issues/48, which suggests that it is caused by a bug in paranamer. Let's upgrade paranamer. Since we are using jackson 2.6.5 and jackson-module-paranamer 2.6.5 use com.thoughtworks.paranamer/paranamer 2.6, I suggests that we upgrade paranamer to 2.6. Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com> Closes #16359 from yhuai/SPARK-18951.
Yin Huai authored## What changes were proposed in this pull request? I recently hit a bug of com.thoughtworks.paranamer/paranamer, which causes jackson fail to handle byte array defined in a case class. Then I find https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-module-scala/issues/48, which suggests that it is caused by a bug in paranamer. Let's upgrade paranamer. Since we are using jackson 2.6.5 and jackson-module-paranamer 2.6.5 use com.thoughtworks.paranamer/paranamer 2.6, I suggests that we upgrade paranamer to 2.6. Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com> Closes #16359 from yhuai/SPARK-18951.
Loading