Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. May 29, 2015
  2. May 12, 2015
    • Ryan Izard's avatar
      Change log level of ACL to debug for all logs except REST API. Info produces... · e4fdabd7
      Ryan Izard authored
      Change log level of ACL to debug for all logs except REST API. Info produces too much debug output for some of these, especially when the ACL is not being actively used.
      e4fdabd7
    • Ryan Izard's avatar
      Added ability to specify the tables to receive table-miss flows for OF1.3+... · da4a847a
      Ryan Izard authored
      Added ability to specify the tables to receive table-miss flows for OF1.3+ switches. What we did before was insert these table-miss flows in all tables, which for OVS is 254 flows and not only is a waste of resources if the tables aren't being used, but also serverly clutters the REST API and Web UI output when listing flows. By default, the first 4 tables will receive the forward-to-controller table-miss flow. The reason for 4 is to account for a small number of software tables present on many hardware switches. If the actual number of tables is less, the lesser value will be used. To modify these settings, there are two options: (1) change the default for all switches or (2) specify the max tables to insert the table-miss flow on a per-DPID basis. These options are exposed in the floodlightdefault.properties file. Toy, no-op examples are given setting the default to 4 and two switches to 4 (the internal default is 4, thus it's a no-op). The list of switches and max tables should be given as a list of JSON key:value objects to the net.floodlightcontroller.core.internal.OFSwitchManager.maxTableToReceiveTableMissFlowPerDpid config variable. The default can be specified as an integer to the net.floodlightcontroller.core.internal.OFSwitchManager.defaultMaxTableToReceiveTableMissFlow variable.
      da4a847a
    • Ryan Izard's avatar
  3. May 11, 2015
    • Ryan Izard's avatar
      Merge pull request #532 from rizard/master · 2999f863
      Ryan Izard authored
      More easily define what to match on in Forwarding
      2999f863
    • Ryan Izard's avatar
      Support for OFTableFeatures messages. OpenFlowJ-Loxi bindings have been... · 1c32664c
      Ryan Izard authored
      Support for OFTableFeatures messages. OpenFlowJ-Loxi bindings have been updated to support a variable pad (byte-aligned to 8 bytes) for each OFTableFeaturesProp list. Loxi has not been 'officially' updated yet though due to a lack of a C implementation. The handshake handler in Floodlight and the switch representations were also updated in order to support OFTableFeatures. By default, the features are requested for an OF1.3+ switch. They will be updated if they are reconfigured through a writeRequest() call IOFSwitch. To access table features, call getTableFeatures(TableId tableToGetFeaturesFor). They are exposed as a TableFeatures type, which more is more efficient than OFTableFeatures for frequent data accesses (especialy OFTableFeatureProp lists).
      1c32664c
    • Ryan Izard's avatar
      Merge pull request #534 from FatRabiTree/master · 757fa671
      Ryan Izard authored
      Fix Web UI link error
      757fa671
  4. May 10, 2015
  5. May 01, 2015
  6. Apr 29, 2015
  7. Apr 27, 2015
  8. Apr 21, 2015
  9. Apr 17, 2015
  10. Apr 16, 2015
  11. Apr 13, 2015
  12. Apr 08, 2015
  13. Apr 03, 2015
  14. Mar 27, 2015
    • deepurple's avatar
      Correct the spelling error · 7477eb97
      deepurple authored
      In line 329 of StaticFlowEntryPusherResource.java, the word "flow mod"
      is spelled as "flod mod".
      Just encountered that when using the rest api, so I fixed it.
      7477eb97
  15. Mar 26, 2015
    • Ryan Izard's avatar
      Forwarding's doDropFlow() changed to not base Match on OFPacketIn, which it... · d8a6f21b
      Ryan Izard authored
      Forwarding's doDropFlow() changed to not base Match on OFPacketIn, which it shouldn't in the first place. We need to first deserialize the packet and use its header attributes. TODO: How much is too much to match on? Sometimes we want a very specific match by default. Other times, we don't. The former creates a larger flow table, while the latter might inadvertently match packets that we don't intend to. Perhaps this should be a user-configurable option? Such as net.floodlightcontroller.Forwarding.matchLayer=L2, L3, or L4?
      d8a6f21b
  16. Mar 20, 2015
Loading