From 0463428b6e8f364f0b1f39445a60cd85ae7c07bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Dusenberry <dusenberrymw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 18:08:57 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [SPARK-7883] [DOCS] [MLLIB] Fixing broken trainImplicit Scala
example in MLlib Collaborative Filtering documentation.
Fixing broken trainImplicit Scala example in MLlib Collaborative Filtering documentation to match one of the possible ALS.trainImplicit function signatures.
Author: Mike Dusenberry <dusenberrymw@gmail.com>
Closes #6422 from dusenberrymw/Fix_MLlib_Collab_Filtering_trainImplicit_Example and squashes the following commits:
36492f4 [Mike Dusenberry] Fixing broken trainImplicit example in MLlib Collaborative Filtering documentation to match one of the possible ALS.trainImplicit function signatures.
---
docs/mllib-collaborative-filtering.md | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/docs/mllib-collaborative-filtering.md b/docs/mllib-collaborative-filtering.md
index 7b397e30b2..dfdf6216b2 100644
--- a/docs/mllib-collaborative-filtering.md
+++ b/docs/mllib-collaborative-filtering.md
@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ other signals), you can use the `trainImplicit` method to get better results.
{% highlight scala %}
val alpha = 0.01
-val model = ALS.trainImplicit(ratings, rank, numIterations, alpha)
+val lambda = 0.01
+val model = ALS.trainImplicit(ratings, rank, numIterations, lambda, alpha)
{% endhighlight %}
</div>
--
GitLab